4.6 Article

Noninvasive prostate cancer screening based on serum surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and support vector machine

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4892667

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61275187, 60778047]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20114407110001]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [9251063101000009]
  4. Cooperation Project in Industry, Education, and Research of Guangdong province
  5. Ministry of Education of China [2011A090200011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to present a noninvasive prostate cancer screening methods using serum surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) and support vector machine (SVM) techniques through peripheral blood sample. SERS measurements are performed using serum samples from 93 prostate cancer patients and 68 healthy volunteers by silver nanoparticles. Three types of kernel functions including linear, polynomial, and Gaussian radial basis function (RBF) are employed to build SVM diagnostic models for classifying measured SERS spectra. For comparably evaluating the performance of SVM classification models, the standard multivariate statistic analysis method of principal component analysis (PCA) is also applied to classify the same datasets. The study results show that for the RBF kernel SVM diagnostic model, the diagnostic accuracy of 98.1% is acquired, which is superior to the results of 91.3% obtained from PCA methods. The receiver operating characteristic curve of diagnostic models further confirm above research results. This study demonstrates that label-free serum SERS analysis technique combined with SVM diagnostic algorithm has great potential for noninvasive prostate cancer screening. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available