4.6 Article

Shape selection and multi-stability in helical ribbons

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 104, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4878941

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [11102040]
  2. Society in Science-Branco Weiss fellowship
  3. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-ER15377]
  4. NASA Astrobiology Program, under the NSF Center for Chemical Evolution [CHE-1004570, NSF-CBC-0739189]
  5. Division Of Chemistry
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1004570] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Helical structures, almost ubiquitous in biological systems, have inspired the design and manufacturing of helical devices with applications in nanoelecromechanical systems, morphing structures, optoelectronics, micro-robotics, and drug delivery devices. Meanwhile, multi-stable structures, represented by the Venus flytrap and slap bracelet, have attracted increasing attention due to their applications in making artificial muscles, bio-inspired robots, deployable aerospace components, and energy harvesting devices. Here we show that the mechanical anisotropy pertinent to helical deformation, together with geometric nonlinearity associated with multi-stability, can lead to a selection principle of the geometric shape and multi-stability in spontaneous helical ribbons. Simple table-top experiments were also performed to illustrate the working principle. Our work will promote understanding of spontaneous curling, twisting, wrinkling of thin objects, and their instabilities. The proposed theoretical framework can also serve as a tool for developing functional structures and devices featuring tunable, morphing geometries and smart actuation mechanisms that can be applied in a spectrum of areas. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available