4.6 Article

Measurements of the force fields within an acoustic standing wave using holographic optical tweezers

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 104, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4872462

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC of the United Kingdom [EP/G036780/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G012067/1, 1096601] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/G012067/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct measurement of the forces experienced by micro-spheres in an acoustic standing wave device have been obtained using calibrated optical traps generated with holographic optical tweezers. A micro-sphere, which is optically trapped in three dimensions, can be moved through the acoustic device to measure forces acting upon it. When the micro-sphere is subjected to acoustic forces, it's equilibrium position is displaced to a position where the acoustic forces and optical forces are balanced. Once the optical trapping stiffness has been calibrated, observation of this displacement enables a direct measurement of the forces acting upon the micro-sphere. The measured forces are separated into a spatially oscillating component, attributed to the acoustic radiation force, and a constant force, attributed to fluid streaming. As the drive conditions of the acoustic device were varied, oscillating forces (>2.5 pN(pp)) and streaming forces (<0.2 pN) were measured. A 5 mu m silica micro-sphere was used to characterise a 6.8MHz standing wave, lambda = 220 mu m, to a spatial resolution limited by the uncertainty in the positioning of the micro-sphere (here to within 2 nm) and with a force resolution on the order of 10 fN. The results have application in the design and testing of acoustic manipulation devices. (C) 2014 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available