4.5 Article

Periosteal grafts as barriers in periradicular surgery:: report of two cases

Journal

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
Volume 37, Issue 9, Pages 632-642

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00855.x

Keywords

apicomarginal communication; guided bone regeneration; membranes; periosteum; periradicular surgery; sinus tract

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To describe the usefulness of periosteal grafts as barriers for bone regeneration in periradicular surgery when advanced periodontal breakdown occurs. Summary The treatment of advanced periodontal breakdown as a result of an associated endodontic lesion constitutes a multifaceted challenge to the clinician. If the source of the irritation cannot be removed by orthograde endodontic treatment, nonsurgical and surgical endodontic/periodontal intervention may be required. Two cases with suppurative chronic apical periodontitis with apicomarginal communication are described. Clinical and radiological evaluations were completed immediately prior to surgery, a week later and every 2 months after surgery for 10 months. Both patients were treated using split-thickness flaps and lateral displacement of the periosteum prior to suturing, in order to close the communication between the oral and the periapical surroundings. A remission of the clinical signs and symptoms, and successful healing in the short-term were achieved in these cases. Key Learning Points Periapical and periodontal lesions are closely related through pathways of communication. Disruption of the cortical plate and the presence of dentoalveolar sinus tracts can have a deleterious effect on the regeneration process after periradicular surgery. The adoption of supplementary periodontal surgical techniques may help to solve some of the difficulties in the healing process in periradicular surgery. Periosteal grafts have been shown to have the potential to stimulate bone formation when used as a graft material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available