4.6 Article

Replication and characterization of the compound eye of a fruit fly for imaging purpose

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 105, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4898060

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61475156, 61361166004, 90923036, 60977041]
  2. Ministry of Sciences and Technology of China [2010DFR10660]
  3. Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Department of China [20116013, 20140519002JH]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we report the replication and characterization of the compound eye of a fruit fly for imaging purpose. In the replication, soft lithography method was employed to replicate the compound eye of a fruit fly into a UV-curable polymer. The method was demonstrated to be effective and the compound eye is replicated into the polymer (NOA78) where each ommatidium has a diameter of about 30 mu m and a sag height of about 7 mu m. To characterize its optical property, the point spread function of the compound eye was tested and a NA of 0.386 has been obtained for the replicated polymeric ommatidium. Comparing with the NA of a real fruit fly ommatidium which was measured to be about 0.212, the replicated polymeric ommatidium has a much larger NA due to the refractive index of NOA78 is much higher than that of the material used to form the real fruit fly ommatidium. Furthermore, the replicated compound eye was used to image a photomask patterned with grating structures to test its imaging property. It is shown that the grating with a line width of 20 mu m can be clearly imaged. The image of the grating formed by the replicated compound eye was shrunk by about 10 times and therefore a line width of about 2.2 mu m in the image plane has been obtained, which is close to the diffraction limited resolution calculated through the measured NA. In summary, the replication method demonstrated is effective and the replicated compound eye has the great potential in optical imaging. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available