4.8 Article

Ceramide reduction and transcriptional up-regulation of glucosylceramide synthase through doxorubicin-activated Sp1 in drug-resistant HL-60/ADR cells

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 64, Issue 17, Pages 6271-6279

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-1476

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR-39448] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Treatment with doxorubicin (DOX) induced apoptosis with an increase of ceramide content in drug-sensitive HL-60 cells, but not in drug-resistant HL-60/ADR cells. In HL-60/ADR cells (but not in HL-60 cells), the levels of mRNA, protein, and activity in glucosylceramide synthase (GCS), which converts ceramide to glucosylceramide, were up-regulated in response to DOX. Thus, abrogation of apoptosis in HL-60/ADR cells might be involved in ceramide reduction through DOX-induced up-regulation of GCS function. Because we reported that a GC-rich/Sp1 promoter binding region was of importance in the regulation of GCS expression, the role of Sp1 in DOX-induced up-regulation of GCS and apoptosis was investigated. DOX induced Sp1 activation in HL-60/ADR cells, as assessed by Sp1 gel shift and promoter-luciferase reporter assays, whereas transfection of double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) containing a GCrich/Sp1 region (Sp1 decoy ODNs) inhibited DOX-induced Sp1 activation. In addition, DOX-increased mRNA and enzyme activity in GCS were inhibited by Sp1 decoy, in conjunction with corresponding elevations of ceramide content. Moreover, DOX-induced apoptotic cell death was significantly increased in Sp1 decoy ODN-transfected HL-60/ADR cells over mock-transfected HL-60/ADR cells. Together, the results suggest that transcriptional up-regulation of GCS through DOX-induced activation of Sp1 is one potential mechanism to regulate ceramide increase and apoptosis in HL-60/ADR cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available