4.6 Article

Role of hepatitis B virus genotypes Ba and C, core promoter and precore mutations on hepatocellular carcinoma: a case control study

Journal

CARCINOGENESIS
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages 1593-1598

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgh172

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes, core promoter (CP) and precore mutants on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still controversial. We aimed to determine their role on the development and clinical features of HCC. HBV genotypes and CP/precore mutations were determined in 90 HCC patients and 180 matched control patients. In the 90 HCC patients, 22 (24.4%) and 68 (75.6%) had subtype Ba and genotype C, respectively. The prevalence of genotype C and CP mutations was significantly higher in HCC patients compared with controls (75.6 versus 57.8%, P = 0.004; 90.9 versus 74.8%, respectively, P = 0.007). Among carriers of genotype C, 91.8% of the HCC patients and 88.8% of controls had CP mutations. Among carriers of subtype Ba, HCC patients had a higher prevalence of CP mutations compared with controls (88.2 versus 54.5%, respectively, P = 0.02). By logistic regression analysis, the only factor associated with HCC was a mutation of the CP region (P = 0.032). There were no differences in the clinical features on presentation, the chance of receiving treatment and the cumulative survival rate for chemoembolization-treated patients between patients with subtype Ba and genotype C. There was too small a number of CP wild-type to do a similar comparison with CP mutants. In conclusion, there was a significantly higher prevalence of both genotype C and CP mutations in patients with HCC. The association between HBV genotype C and HCC was probably not genuine but was due to the high percentage of CP mutations in patients with genotype C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available