4.7 Article

Triple-detector GPC characterization and processing behavior of long-chain-branched polyethylene prepared by solution polymerization with constrained geometry catalyst

Journal

POLYMER
Volume 45, Issue 19, Pages 6495-6505

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.07.035

Keywords

polyethylene (PE); long chain branching; gel permeation chromatography characterization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fourteen long-chain branched (LCB) polyethylene (PE) samples were prepared by a constrained geometry catalyst. The PE samples had average branching frequencies of 0.06-0.98 branches per polymer chain, as determined by the nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (C-13 NMR). These samples, as well as five linear PEs were characterized using a gel permeation chromatography (GPC) coupled with online three-angle laser light scattering (LS), differential refractive index (DRI), and viscosity (CV) detectors. The root mean-square radius of gyration (r(g)(2)(1/2)), intrinsic viscosity ([eta]), and molecular mass (M) of the PEs were measured for each elution fraction. Based on the comparison of the long-chain branching (LCB) PEs with their linear counterparts and the Zimm-Stockmayer equation, the distributions of long-chain branch frequency (LCBF) and density (LCBD) as function of molecular mass were estimated. It was found that although the LCBF increased with the increase of molecular mass, the LCBD showed a maximum value in the medium molecular mass range for most of the PE samples. The average LCBD data from the GPC analysis were in good agreement with the 1 3 C NMR measurements. The rheological properties and processing behavior of these samples were also assessed. While the long chain branching showed significant effects on the modulus and viscosity, it did not improve the processing. Compared to linear PE, polymer melt flow instabilities such as sharkskin, stick-slip and gross melt fracture developed in extrusion of LCB PEs occur-red at lower wall shear stresses and apparent shear rates. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available