4.7 Article

Age-related functional changes of prefrontal cortex in long-term memory: A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 36, Pages 7939-7944

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0703-04.2004

Keywords

long-term memory; neuroimaging; transcranial magnetic stimulation; rTMS; prefrontal cortex; hippocampal formation; aging

Categories

Funding

  1. Telethon [E.C0985] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroimaging findings suggest that the lateralization of prefrontal cortex activation associated with episodic memory performance is reduced by aging. It is still a matter of debate whether this loss of asymmetry during encoding and retrieval reflects compensatory mechanisms or de-differentiation processes. We addressed this issue by the transient interference produced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), which directly assesses causal relationships between performance and stimulated regions. We compared the effects of rTMS ( a rapid-rate train occurring simultaneously to the presentation of memoranda) applied to the left or right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on visuospatial recognition memory in 66 healthy subjects divided in two classes of age (<45 and >50 years). In young subjects, rTMS of the right DLPFC interfered with retrieval more than left DLPFC stimulation. The asymmetry of the effect progressively vanished with aging, as indicated by bilateral interference effects on recognition performance. Conversely, the predominance of left DLPFC effect during encoding was not abolished in elders, thus probing its causal role for encoding along the life span. Findings confirm that the neural correlates of retrieval modify along aging, suggesting that the bilateral engagement of the DLPFC has a compensatory role on the elders' episodic memory performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available