4.7 Review

Dust and star formation in distant radio galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 353, Issue 2, Pages 377-390

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08063.x

Keywords

galaxies : active; galaxies : formation; galaxies : high-redshift; radio continuum : galaxies; submillimetre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the results of an observing programme with the Submillimetre Common User Bolometer Array (SCUBA) to measure the submillimetre (submm) dust continuum emission of 24 distant (z > 1) radio galaxies. We detected submm emission in 12 galaxies with signal-to-noise > 3, including nine detections at z > 3. When added to previous published results these data almost triple the number of radio galaxies with z > 3 detected. in the submm and yield a sample of 69 observed radio galaxies over the redshift range z = 1-5. We find that the range in rest-frame far-infrared luminosities is about a factor of 10. We have investigated the origin of this dispersion, correlating the luminosities with radio source power, size, spectral index, K-band magnitude and Lyalpha luminosity. No strong correlations are apparent in the combined data set. We confirm and strengthen the result from previous submm observations of radio galaxies that the detection rate is a strong function of redshift. We compare the redshift dependence of the submm properties of radio galaxies with those of quasars and find that for both classes of objects the observed submm flux density increases with redshift to z approximate to 4, beyond which, for the galaxies, we find tentative evidence for a decline. We find evidence for an anticorrelation between submm luminosity and ultraviolet polarization fraction, for a subsample of 13 radio galaxies, indicating that starbursts are the dominant source of heating for dust in radio galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available