4.8 Article

Atrial fibrillation is associated with increased spontaneous calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in human atrial myocytes

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages 1358-1363

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000141296.59876.87

Keywords

sarcoplasmic reticulum; calcium; arrhythmia; ion channels; electrophysiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-Spontaneous Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) can generate afterdepolarizations, and these have the potential to initiate arrhythmias. Therefore, an association may exist between spontaneous SR Ca2+ release and initiation of atrial fibrillation (AF), but this has not yet been reported. Methods and Results-Spontaneous Ca2+ release from the SR, manifested as Ca2+ sparks and Ca2+ waves, was recorded with confocal microscopy in atrial myocytes isolated from patients with and those without AF. In addition, the spontaneous inward current associated with Ca2+ waves was measured with the use of the perforated patch-clamp technique. The Ca2+ spark frequency was higher in 8 patients with AF than in 16 patients without (6.0+/-1.2 versus 2.8+/-0.8 sparks/mm per second, P<0.05). Similarly, the spontaneous Ca2+ wave frequency was greater in patients with AF (2.8 +/- 0.5 versus 1.1 +/- 0.3 waves/mm per second, P<0.01). The spontaneous inward current frequency was also higher in 10 patients with AF than in 13 patients without this arrhythmia (0.101+/-0.028 versus 0.031+/-0.007 per second, P<0.05, at a clamped potential of -80 mV). In contrast, both the Ca2+ released from the SR and the Na+-Ca2+ exchange rate induced by a rapid caffeine application were comparable in patients with and without AF. Conclusions-The observed increase in spontaneous Ca2+ release in patients with AF probably is due to an upregulation of the SR Ca2+ release channel activity, which may contribute to the development of AF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available