4.2 Article

Persistence of diaphragmatic contraction influences the pulmonary inflammatory response to mechanical ventilation

Journal

RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 142, Issue 2-3, Pages 185-195

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2004.06.012

Keywords

mechanical ventilation; neuromuscular blockade; diaphragm; macrophages; cytokines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because we already showed (Bregeon, F., Roch, A., Delpierre, S., Ghigo, E., Autillo-Touati, A., Kajikawa, O., Martin, T., Pugin, J., Portugal, H., Auffray, J., Jammes, Y., 2002. Conventional mechanical ventilation of healthy lungs induced proinflammatory cytokine gene transcription, Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 132, 191-203) that non-injurious mechanical ventilation (MV) elicited inflammatory signal in paralyzed rabbits having normal lungs, we examined the role of neuromuscular blockade in the pulmonary inflammatory response. In the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), leukocyte count, MCP-1 and IL-8 cytokine concentrations (ELISA) and mRNAs (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR) were measured in paralyzed (P) or non-paralyzed (NP) rabbits ventilated for a 6-h period. Compared to the P group and despite the tidal volume was the same, we measured in the NP one a lower compliance of the respiratory system (Crs,stat), a longer inspiratory time (Ti), a negative inspiratory tracheal pressure (Ptr) wave preceding the pump-induced positive pressure wave, and a higher peak tracheal pressure. Moreover, in NP animals, gross autopsy showed negligible lung abnormalities, and marked reduction of leukocyte count and lung cytokines (P < 0.05). Thus, the absence of neuromuscular blockade decreased the pulmonary chemotactic response to MV suggesting that the total suppression of negative pressure waves elicited by the diaphragmatic (di) contractions could be involved in this lung response to positive pressure MV. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available