4.2 Article

Synthesis of asymmetric star-branched polymers consisting of three or four different segments in composition by means of living anionic polymerization with a new dual-functionalized 1,1-bis(3-chloromethylphenyl)ethylene

Journal

JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE PART A-POLYMER CHEMISTRY
Volume 42, Issue 18, Pages 4535-4547

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pola.20362

Keywords

anionic polymerization; living polymerization; star polymers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of four-armed A(2)BC, AB(2)C, and ABC(2) asymmetric star-branched polymers with a three-component system, the A, B, and C segments of which are polystyrene, polyisoprene, and poly(4-trimethylsilylstyrene), respectively, have been successfully synthesized with a methodology based on living anionic polymerization with dual-functionalized 1.,1-bis(3-chloromethylphenyl)ethylene (1). These star-branched polymers have well-defined architectures and precisely controlled chain lengths, as confirmed by size exclusion chromatography, H-1 and C-13 NMR, vapor pressure osmometry, and static light scattering analyses. A simple and convenient one-pot process for star-branched polymer synthesis is an additional advantage of this methodology. One problem to be solved is that the synthetic route is limited in some cases by the inherently low reactivity of polyisoprenyllithium toward the 1,1-diphenylethylene functionality of in-chain-functionalized polymers. A new four-armed ABCD star-branched polymer, the A, B, C, and D segments of which are polyisoprene, poly(4-methoxystyrene), polystyrene, and poly(4-trimethylsilylstyrene), could also be synthesized through the extension of the methodology using 1 to a four-component system. The successful results strongly demonstrate the synthetic versatility and potential of this methodology for a wide variety of well-defined asymmetric star-branched polymers. (C) 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available