4.7 Article

Frontal lobe volume, function, and β-amyloid pathology in a canine model of aging

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 38, Pages 8205-8213

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1339-04.2004

Keywords

brain volume; frontal lobe; aging; beagle; MRI; amyloid

Categories

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG12694, R01 AG012694, R37 AG012694, R01 AG017066, AG17066] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques reveals that human brain aging varies across cortical regions. One area particularly sensitive to normal aging is the frontal lobes. In vitro neuropathological studies and behavioral measures in a canine model of aging previously suggested that the frontal lobes of the dog might be sensitive to aging. In the present study, MRI scans were acquired to compare age-related changes in frontal lobe volume with changes in executive functions and beta-amyloid pathology in the frontal cortex of beagle dogs aged 3 months to 15 years. Decreases in total brain volume appeared only in senior dogs ( aged 12 years and older), whereas frontal lobe atrophy developed earlier, appearing in the old dogs ( aged 8 - 11 years). Hippocampal volume also declined with age, but not occipital lobe volume past maturity. Reduced frontal lobe volume correlated with impaired performance on measures of executive function, including inhibitory control and complex working memory, and with increased beta-amyloid accumulation in the frontal cortex. Age-related hippocampal atrophy also correlated with complex working memory but not inhibitory control, whereas occipital lobe volume did not correlate with any cognitive measure. These findings are consistent with the frontal lobe theory of aging in humans, which suggests that the frontal lobes and functions subserved by this region are compromised early in aging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available