4.6 Article

Electronic transport in graphene-based heterostructures

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 104, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4872178

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under Research Fellowship (RF) [NRF-RF2008-7]
  2. SMF-NUS
  3. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office, Singapore under Competitive Research Programme (CRP) [NRF-CRP6-2010-5]
  4. Singapore National Research Foundation under NRF Research Fellowship [NRF-NRFF2011-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While boron nitride (BN) substrates have been utilized to achieve high electronic mobilities in graphene field effect transistors, it is unclear how other layered two dimensional (2D) crystals influence the electronic performance of graphene. In this Letter, we study the surface morphology of 2D BN, gallium selenide (GaSe), and transition metal dichalcogenides (tungsten disulfide (WS2) and molybdenum disulfide (MoS2)) crystals and their influence on graphene's electronic quality. Atomic force microscopy analysis shows that these crystals have improved surface roughness (root mean square value of only similar to 0.1 nm) compared to conventional SiO2 substrate. While our results confirm that graphene devices exhibit very high electronic mobility (mu) on BN substrates, graphene devices on WS2 substrates (G/WS2) are equally promising for high quality electronic transport (mu similar to 38 000 cm(2)/V s at room temperature), followed by G/MoS2 (mu similar to 10 000 cm(2)/V s) and G/GaSe (mu similar to 2200 cm(2)/V s). However, we observe a significant asymmetry in electron and hole conduction in G/WS2 and G/MoS2 heterostructures, most likely due to the presence of sulphur vacancies in the substrate crystals. GaSe crystals are observed to degrade over time even under ambient conditions, leading to a large hysteresis in graphene transport making it a less suitable substrate. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available