4.4 Article

HLA- and dose-dependent immunogenicity of a peptide based HIV-1 immunotherapy candidate (Vacc-4x)

Journal

AIDS
Volume 18, Issue 14, Pages 1875-1883

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200409240-00003

Keywords

HIV-1; therapeutic vaccines; immunotherapy; delayed type hypersensitivity; HLA-restriction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The Vacc-4x immunotherapy candidate is composed of four modified peptides corresponding to conserved domains of the HIV-1 protein p24 that preferentially include HLA-A2 restricted elements. Dose-dependent safety and immunogenicity of Vacc-4x and the significance of a HLA-A2 haplotype were examined. Design: Non-AIDS, HIV-1 infected healthy patients (n = 40) stable on HAART with CD4 counts > 300 X 10(6) cells/l were randomized to receive either low-dose or highdose Vacc-4x over 26 weeks in an open, prospective phase II clinical trial. Methods: Patients received a total of 10 intradermal injections, using recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor as a local adjuvant. Vacc-4x-specific cellular responses were monitored in vivo by delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin test infiltrates and in vitro by both T-cell proliferation, and induction secretion of cytokines. Results: Most patients developed Vacc-4x-specific DTHs (90%) and proliferative T-cell responses (80%) that were inter-related in magnitude. High-dose Vacc-4x generally induced stronger specific immune responses than low dose in terms of DTH areas and CD4 and CD8 T-cell proliferation. Only HLA-A2 negative patients had a definite dose advantage, and this subgroup had in fact the best overall DTH and proliferative responses. In contrast, no significant dose difference was observed for HLA-A2 positive patients. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: HIV-associated specific responses were safely induced in most patients by Vacc-4x in a dose-dependent manner and were also influenced by the HLA haplotype. (C) 2004 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available