4.7 Article

A quantitative map of the circuit of cat primary visual cortex

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 39, Pages 8441-8453

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1400-04.2004

Keywords

cell types; cell reconstruction; interlaminar connectivity; synaptic weights; connectivity rule; laminar distribution

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We developed a quantitative description of the circuits formed in cat area 17 by estimating the weight of the projections between different neuronal types. To achieve this, we made three-dimensional reconstructions of 39 single neurons and thalamic afferents labeled with horseradish peroxidase during intracellular recordings in vivo. These neurons served as representatives of the different types and provided the morphometrical data about the laminar distribution of the dendritic trees and synaptic boutons and the number of synapses formed by a given type of neuron. Extensive searches of the literature provided the estimates of numbers of the different neuronal types and their distribution across the cortical layers. Applying the simplification that synapses between different cell types are made in proportion to the boutons and dendrites that those cell types contribute to the neuropil in a given layer, we were able to estimate the probable source and number of synapses made between neurons in the six layers. The predicted synaptic maps were quantitatively close to the estimates derived from the experimental electron microscopic studies for the case of the main sources of excitatory and inhibitory input to the spiny stellate cells, which form a major target of layer 4 afferents. The map of the whole cortical circuit shows that there are very few strong but many weak excitatory projections, each of which may involve only a few percentage of the total complement of excitatory synapses of a single neuron.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available