4.4 Article

Comparison of microarray-based mRNA profiling technologies for identification of psychiatric disease and drug signatures

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 138, Issue 1-2, Pages 173-188

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.04.002

Keywords

microarray; bipolar disorder; Q-PCR; gene expression; mRNA; prefrontal cortex; neuroblastoma; valproate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The gene expression profiles of human postmortem parietal and prefrontal cortex samples of normal controls and patients with bipolar disease, or human neuroblastoma flat (NBFL) cells treated with the mood-stabilizing drug, valproate, were used to compare the performance of Affymetrix oligonucleotide U133A GeneChips(C) and Agilent Human 1 cDNA microarrays. Among those genes represented on both platforms, the oligo array identified 26-53% more differentially expressed genes compared to the cDNA array in the three experiments, when identical fold change and t-test criteria were applied. The increased sensitivity was primarily the result of more robust fold changes measured by the oligonucleotide system. Essentially all gene changes overlapping between the two platforms were co-directional, and ranged from 4 to 19% depending upon the amount of biological variability within and between the comparison groups. Q-PCR validation rates were virtually identical for the two platforms, with 23-24% validation in the prefrontal cortex experiment, and 56% for both platforms in the cell culture experiment. Validated genes included dopa decarboxylase, doparnine beta-hydroxylase, and dihydropyrimidinase-related protein 3, which were decreased in NBFL cells exposed to valproate, and spinocerebellar ataxia 7, which was increased in bipolar disease. The modest overlap but similar validation rates show that each microarray system identifies a unique set of differentially expressed genes, and thus the greatest information is obtained from the use of both platforms. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available