4.5 Article

Electron density in the magnetosphere

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2003JA010245

Keywords

magnetospheric electron density; empirical density model; plasmasphere

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observations of the electron density ne based on measurement of the upper hybrid resonance frequency by the Polar spacecraft Plasma Wave Instrument (PWI) are available for March 1996 to September 1997, during which time the Polar orbit sampled all MLT values three times. In a previous study, we modeled the electron density dependence along field lines as n(e)=n(e0)(R-max/R)(alpha), where n(e0) is the equatorial electron density, R(max)approximate toLR(E) is the maximum geocentric radius R to any point on the field line, and alpha=alpha(model)=8.0-3.0 log(10)n(e0)+0.28(log(10)n(e0))(2)-0.43(R-max/R-E), for all categories of plasma (plasmasphere and plasmatrough). (In the formula for alpha(model), n(e0) is expressed in cm(-3).) Here, we illustrate the field line dependence using several example events. We show that the plasmapause is much more evident on the large radius portion of the orbit and that at Rsimilar to2 R-E the electron density tends to level out at large R-max to a constant value similar to100 cm(-3). We also present an example of plasmaspheric plasma extending out to at least Lsimilar to9 on the dawnside during particularly calm geomagnetic conditions (as indicated by low Kp). Then we present the average equatorial profiles of n(e0) versus R-max for plasmasphere and plasmatrough. Our average plasmasphere profile is found to have values intermediate between those based on the models of Carpenter and Anderson and Sheeley et al. The plasmatrough equatorial density n(e0) scales with respect to R-max like R-max(-3.4), but in the region for which our plasmatrough data is most reliable (Lless than or equal to6), it is well fit by the R-max(-4.0) scaling of Sheeley et al. or the R-max(-4.5) scaling of Carpenter and Anderson. We present a simple interpretation for the field line dependence of the density. For large n(e0), such as occurs in the plasmasphere, a is close to zero on average (implying that n(e) is roughly constant along field lines). When n(e0) decreases, so does ne at R=2 R-E, but the value there does not decrease much below 100 cm(-3). (It is unclear if this value is an absolute lower density limit because most often the upper hybrid resonance emission disappears at Rsimilar to2 R-E because f(p)/f(ce)<1, where f(p)proportional to root n(e) is the plasma frequency and f(ce) is the electron cyclotron frequency.) Finally, we examined the dependence of alpha and the density at the equator and at R similar to 2 R-E on the average < Kp > (Kp averaged with a 3-day timescale). There is no clear dependence of the average alpha-alpha model on < Kp > or on MLT. In the plasmasphere, n(e0) decreases with respect to increasing < Kp >.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available