4.6 Article

Population history and natural selection shape patterns of genetic variation in 132 genes

Journal

PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 2, Issue 10, Pages 1591-1599

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020286

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL66642, U01 HL069757, U01 HL066682, U01 HL69757, HL66682, U01 HL066642] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R37 MH059520, R01 MH059520, MH59520] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identifying regions of the human genome that have been targets of natural selection will provide important insights into human evolutionary history and may facilitate the identification of complex disease genes. Although the signature that natural selection imparts on DNA sequence variation is difficult to disentangle from the effects of neutral processes such as population demographic history, selective and demographic forces can be distinguished by analyzing multiple loci dispersed throughout the genome. We studied the molecular evolution of 132 genes by comprehensively resequencing them in 24 African-Americans and 23 European-Americans. We developed a rigorous computational approach for taking into account multiple hypothesis tests and demographic history and found that while many apparent selective events can instead be explained by demography, there is also strong evidence for positive or balancing selection at eight genes in the European-American population, but none in the African-American population. Our results suggest that the migration of modern humans out of Africa into new environments was accompanied by genetic adaptations to emergent selective forces. In addition, a region containing four contiguous genes on Chromosome 7 showed striking evidence of a recent selective sweep in European-Americans. More generally, our results have important implications for mapping genes underlying complex human diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available