The IGEX experiment reexamined: A response to the critique of Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, Dietz, and Krivosheina

This paper is a response to the preceding Comment by Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, Dietz, and Krivosheina. The criticisms are confronted, and the questions raised are answered. We demonstrate that the lower limit quoted by IGEX, T-1/2(0nu)(Ge-76)greater than or equal to1.57x10(25) yr, is correct and that there was no arithmetical error as claimed in the Critical View article.