4.7 Article

Dead wood threshold values for the three-toed woodpecker presence in boreal and sub-Alpine forest

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 119, Issue 3, Pages 305-318

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.014

Keywords

dead wood; snag; Picoides tridactylus; conservation; forest management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Predicting species' responses to habitat loss is a significant challenge facing conservation biologists. We examined the response of both European three-toed woodpecker subspecies Picoides tridactylus tridactylus and P. tr. alpinus to different amounts of dead wood in a boreal and a sub-Alpine coniferous forest landscape in central Sweden and Switzerland, respectively. Habitat variables were measured by fieldwork in forests with breeding woodpeckers (n = 10 + 12) and in control forests without breeding woodpeckers (n = 10 + 12) in the same landscape. Logistic regression analyses revealed steep thresholds for the amount of dead standing trees and the probability of three-toed woodpecker presence in both Sweden and Switzerland. The probability of the presence of three-toed woodpeckers increased from 0.10 to 0.95 when snag basal area increased from 0.6 to 1.3 m(2) ha(-1) in Switzerland and from 0.3 to 0.5 m(2) ha(-1) in central Sweden. In Switzerland, a high road network density was negatively correlated to the presence of woodpeckers (r = -0.65, p = 0.0007). The higher volumes of dead wood in Switzerland, where population trends are more positive, than in central Sweden, where the population is declining, would suggest that the volumes of dead wood in managed forests in Sweden are too low to sustain three-toed woodpeckers in the long-term. In terms of management implications, we suggest a quantitative target of at least 5% of standing trees in older forests being dead over at least 100 ha large forest areas. This corresponds about to greater than or equal to1.3 m(2) ha(-1) (basal area) or greater than or equal to15 m(3) ha(-1) (volume), still depending on site productivity. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available