4.6 Article

Echocardiographic and clinical characteristics of pulmonary hypertension complicating pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis

Journal

MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
Volume 79, Issue 10, Pages 1269-1275

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.4065/79.10.1269

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To determine the echocardiographic characteristics and impact on survival of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and correlations between echocardiographic and clinical variables in patients with pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis (PLCH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 123 adults seen at our institution between January 1976 and December 2002 with histologically proven PLCH, 17 underwent echocardiographic evaluation. Correlations were performed between echocardiographic measures of PH and clinical variables. Cumulative survival probabilities for patients with PH were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared to a historical cohort of patients with PILCH using time-dependent proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: Of the 17 patients, PH (estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure [PASP] at rest, >35 mm Hg) was present in 3.5. Thirteen patients (6 men; median PASP, 67 mm Hg; range, 41.2-90.6 mm Hg) had no other known causes of PH. All patients were smokers. Nine patients had a PASP of more than 50 mm Hg. An inverse correlation was found between the forced vital capacity and PASP (r=-0.61; P=.03); no correlation was found between PASP and other pulmonary function parameters. Seven patients with a PASP greater than 65 mm Hg had an enlarged right ventricle with impaired systolic function. The development of PH in patients with PLCH was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio, 22.8; 95% confidence interval, 7.6 to >68.9; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Severe PH occurs in PLCH, correlates with the forced vital capacity, and has a significant impact on survival. Clinicians should consider echocardiographic screening for PH in all dyspneic patients with PLCH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available