4.7 Article

First polar body morphology before ICSI is not related to embryo quality or pregnancy rate

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages 2334-2339

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh433

Keywords

embryo quality; first polar body; pregnancy rate; sperm injection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between the first polar body (1st PB) morphology and the fertilization rate, cleavage rate, embryo quality, pregnancy and implantation rate. METHODS: This was a retrospective study on 167 consecutive cycles undergoing assisted reproduction with ICSI. The 1st PB morphology was evaluated at the moment of ICSI in the 596 injected oocytes and it was coded as intact or fragmented. The fertilization rate, cleavage rate, embryo quality (three grades), pregnancy rate, implantation rate and the time elapsed between oocyte retrieval and ICSI were evaluated. The 1st PB morphology was checked twice (denudation and ICSI) in a random sample of 180 oocytes in order to verify the effect of the in vitro culture. RESULTS: No significant relationship was found between the 1st PB morphology and the fertilization rate (P=0.703), cleavage rate (P=0.055), embryo quality (P=0.673), pregnancy rate (P=0.201) and implantation rate (P=0.511). A significant positive relationship (P=0.006) was found between the frequency of the 1st PB fragmentation and the time elapsed between denudation and ICSI. The pregnancy rate was significantly higher (P=0.008) when oocytes were injected between 5 and 7 h after retrieval rather than earlier or later. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the embryo quality, pregnancy rate and implantation rate are not related to the 1st PB fragmentation. The time which elapses between the oocyte retrieval and ICSI should be maintained at similar to6 h in order to obtain optimal results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available