4.4 Article

Factors influencing compulsory admission in first-admitted subjects with psychosis

Journal

SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 10, Pages 804-809

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-004-0826-5

Keywords

psychosis; first episode; pathways to care; compulsory admission; risk factors

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background There is a growing body of evidence that patients with early psychosis have undesirable pathways to care, yet few studies have explored the factors related to compulsory admission in patients with psychosis. The aim of the present study was to examine the demographic and clinical factors and pathways to care influencing compulsory admission in first-admitted subjects with psychosis. Methods Pathways to care, clinical and demographic characteristics, were assessed using multiple sources of information in 86 subjects with psychosis first admitted in two hospitals of South-Western France. Characteristics independently associated with compulsory admission were explored using logistic regressions. Results Nearly two-thirds of the subjects (61.6%) were compulsorily admitted. Compulsory admission was independently predicted by being a male (adjusted OR = 3.2, 95 % CI 1.2-8.6, p = 0.02), having a diagnosis of schizophrenia broadly defined (adjusted OR = 2.8, 95 % CI 1.02-7.4, p = 0.04) and absence of depressive or anxiety symptoms (adjusted OR =0.05, 95 % CI 0.005-0.5, p = 0.01). Conclusion These results suggest that factors related to the disease itself play an important role in decisions concerning compulsory admission. The high frequency of compulsory admission as the first mode of contact with psychiatric hospital in subjects with psychosis constitutes a major public health issue. Further research on the strategies aimed at avoiding compulsory admission in subjects with incipient psychosis is necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available