4.7 Review

Review article: the aetiopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease - immunology and repair mechanisms

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 20, Issue -, Pages 9-17

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02047.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the aetiopathogenesis of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, remains unsolved, current evidence indicates that defective T-cell apoptosis and impairment of intestinal epithelial barrier function play important roles in the pathogenesis of both conditions. Without appropriate control of T-cell proliferation and death during an immune response, an inappropriate accumulation of T cells and subsequent intestinal inflammation may occur. Differences in T-cell responses between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis have been identified, with mucosal T-cell apoptosis being defective in Crohn's disease, but not in ulcerative colitis. Furthermore, cell cycling is considerably faster, with a vigorous clonal expansion, in Crohn's disease, whereas, in ulcerative colitis, T cells cycle normally, but have a remarkably reduced capacity to divide and expand. The elimination of excessive T cells therefore seems to be a reasonable approach to restore the gut to a physiological state or, at least, a controlled state of inflammation. The tumour necrosis factor-alpha blocker, infliximab, exerts its beneficial effects, at least in part, by the induction of apoptosis in lamina propria T cells and monocytes. In addition, repeated damage and injury of the intestinal surface is a hallmark of inflammatory bowel disease and may facilitate the entry of luminal antigens into the mammalian organism and the initiation and perpetuation of both nonspecific and specific immune responses. A better understanding of and enhancement of intestinal repair mechanisms may thus provide future approaches for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available