4.6 Article

Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty

Journal

BJU INTERNATIONAL
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages 867-869

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05048.x

Keywords

oral complications; buccal mucosal graft harvesting; urethroplasty

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE To report long-term oral complications after buccal mucosal graft (BMG) harvesting for urethroplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a retrospective study of all patients who had BMG harvesting for urethroplasty from April 1996 to September 2002, telephone interviews were conducted using a standard proforma. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were identified but only 30 (mean age 48.3 years, range 24-86) could be contacted; they had had 31 operations. Soon after surgery (the first 48 h), 22 (73%) of the patients had little or no oral pain; 70% and 90% of the patients were able to eat and drink, respectively; 59% complained of numbness and 75% complained of tightness of the mouth. At discharge 6 days after surgery 90% of patients had little or no oral pain and all were able to eat and drink, but 10% had moderate-to-severe oral pain, 39% had oral numbness, and 52% had tightness of the mouth. At the time of interview, 16% of patients had oral numbness (mean duration 13.6 months) and 32% had tightness of the mouth (mean duration 20.9 months). In answer to the question of whether they would have their cheek mucosa harvested again if required, 74% responded 'yes', 3% 'no', and 23% had mixed feelings. CONCLUSIONS BMG harvesting is a good operation, as most patients were satisfied, but it is not without long-term complications and patients should be adequately informed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available