4.7 Article

Functional differences among those high and low on a trait measure of psychopathy

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 56, Issue 7, Pages 516-521

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.06.030

Keywords

amygdala; emotion recognition; functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); inferior frontal; psychopathy; psychopathy personality inventory (PPI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: It has been established that individuals who score high on measures of psychopathy demonstrate difficulty when performing tasks requiring the interpretation of others emotional states. The aim of this study was to elucidate the relation of emotion and cognition to individual differences on a standard psychopathy personality inventory (PPI) among a nonpsychiatric Methods. Twenty participants completed the PPI Following survey completion, a mean split of their scores on the emotional-interpersonal factor was performed, and participants were placed into a high or low group. Functional magnetic resonance imaging data were collected while participants performed a recognition task that required attention be given to either the affect or identity of target stimuli. Results. No significant behavioral differences were found. In response to the affect recognition task, significant differences between high- and low-scoring subjects were observed in several subregions of the frontal cortex, as well as the amygdala. No significant differences were found between the groups in response to the identity recognition condition. Conclusions: Results indicate that participants scoring high on the PPI, although not behaviorally distinct, demonstrate a significantly different pattern of neural activity (as measured by blood oxygen level-dependent contrast) in response to tasks that require affective processing. The results suggest a unique neural signature associated with personality differences in a nonpsychiatric population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available