4.3 Review

Mechanism of lipoprotein retention extracellular matrix

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 505-514

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00041433-200410000-00003

Keywords

apolipoprotein B; atherosclerosis; glycosaminoglycans; proteoglycan; retention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Considerable evidence suggests that the subendothelial retention of atherogenic lipoproteins is a key early step in atherogenesis. In humans and experimental animals, elevated levels of plasma lipoproteins are associated with increased atherosclerosis, and lipoproteins with higher affinity for arterial proteoglycans are more atherogenic. Here we discuss the molecular mechanisms underlying lipoprotein retention in the arterial wall and how this interaction can be modulated. Recent findings Functional proteoglycan binding sites in lipoproteins containing apolipoprotein B have been identified and shown to have atherogenic potential in vivo. In addition to apolipoprotein B, novel bridging molecules, those that can interact with both proteoglycans and lipoproteins, have been identified that mediate the retention of atherogenic particles in the vessel wall. The interaction between lipoproteins and proteoglycans can be enhanced by the modification of lipoproteins in the circulation and in the arterial wall, by alterations in the subendothelium, and by changes in proteoglycan synthesis that result in a more atherogenic profile. The retention of atherogenic lipoproteins is a potential target for therapies to reverse atherosclerosis, and in-vitro studies have identified compounds that decrease the affinity of proteoglycans for lipoproteins. Summary Considerable progress has been made in understanding the association between lipoproteins and cardiovascular disease. This review highlights the importance of the interaction between lipoproteins and the arterial matrix.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available