Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages 3817-3841Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431160410001688286
Keywords
-
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Wind maps are retrieved from ERS-2 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) scenes by the CMOD-IFR2 and CMOD4 algorithms for 61 cases at the Horns Rev site in the North Sea and compared to meteorological in situ observations from a mast located 14 km offshore. The in situ data are corrected for flow distortion and sea-level changes prior to validating the SAR wind maps. The SAR wind maps are area-averaged by a simple footprint method assuming neutral stability and with three nonlinear weighting footprint methods including correction for stability. From a physical point of view, the latter is more correct. However, between in situ and SAR-derived wind-speed estimates comparison results of the nonlinear footprint values are statistically less correlated (R-2 = 0.73 - 0.77) and the standard error (SE) is larger (>1.5 m s(-1)) than results from the simple footprint (R-2 = 0.78 - 0.80 and SE = 1.3 ms(-1)). The results are found with wind direction determined from wind streaks in the SAR images by Fast Fourier Transform. Using in situ wind direction as input to the CMOD-IFR2 and CMOD4 algorithms yields even better linear regression results, e. g. for the simple footprint method R-2 = 0.88 and SE = 0.9 m s(-1). SAR wind maps may be useful for mapping of future offshore wind resources.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available