4.3 Article

Low level cadmium exposure, renal and bone effects -: the OSCAR study

Journal

BIOMETALS
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 505-509

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/B:BIOM.0000045729.68774.a1

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well known that high cadmium exposure causes renal damage, osteoporosis and osteomalacia, whereas the dose-response relationships at low-level exposure are less well established. WHO estimated (1992) that a urinary excretion of 10 nmol/mmol creatinine would constitute a 'critical limit' below which kidney damage would not occur. Later, Belgian and Swedish studies have shown signs of cadmium induced kidney dysfunction in the general population already at urinary cadmium levels around 2-3 nmol/mmol creatinine. The Swedish OSCAR (OSteoporosis-CAdmium as a Risk factor) study comprised 1021 individuals, exposed to cadmium in the environment. Blood and urinary cadmium were used as dose estimates. Protein HC (alpha-1-microglobulin) was used as an indicator of renal tubular damage. Forearm bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed with DXA (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry) technique. The study showed that tubular proteinuria occurred at much lower levels of cadmium dose than previously known. A negative dose-effect relationship was found between cadmium dose and BMD for people at the age of 60 or older. In this age group, there was also a dose-response relationship, showing a three-fold increased risk of low BMD in the group with urinary cadmium over 3 nmol/mmol creatinine, as compared to the lowest dose group. There was also evidence of an increased risk of forearm fractures with increasing cadmium levels in the population 50 years of age or older. The potential public health consequences of low level cadmium exposure should be recognized, and measures taken to reduce cadmium exposure to an absolute minimum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available