4.7 Article

Potential survival advantage with early androgen deprivation for biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy: The importance of accurately defining biochemical disease status

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.03.013

Keywords

prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostate-specific antigen; radiotherapy; hormonal therapy; biochemical failure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: We analyzed our experience treating localized prostate cancer to determine the impact of androgen deprivation (AD) on clinical outcome if administered at the time of isolated biochemical failure (BF) vs. after clinical failure (clinical failure), and the associated impact of various BF definitions. Methods: A total of 1,201 patients with stage T1-T3N0M0 prostate cancer were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to a median dose of 66.6 Gy. Early AD was defined as administration of AD after BF, without evidence of clinical failure. Delayed AD was defined as administration of AD after clinical failure. Multiple BF definitions were tested for capacity to predict subsequent clinical failure. For each BF definition, outcome was compared for BF patients receiving early AD vs. no or delayed AD. Results: Five-year clinical failure (from date of BF) was 60% for patients who experienced a prostate-specific antigen rise to greater than or equal to3 ng/mL above nadir. For these patients, early AD was associated with decreased 5-year local failure (4% vs. 33%), distant metastasis (13% vs. 44%), cause-specific death (9% vs. 24%), and death due to any cause (32% vs. 48%), despite poorer prognostic factors in patients receiving early AD. On multivariate analysis, early AD remained independently significant for each of these end points. Conclusion: The efficacy of AD after BF varies depending on the BF definition. When an optimal BF definition is applied, early AD decreases distant metastasis and improves survival. Prostate-specific antigen elevation to :2 or greater than or equal to3 ng/mL above nadir seems optimal in establishing clinically significant BF and the timing of AD intervention. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available