4.7 Article

Aortic pulse wave velocity in renal transplant patients

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages 1486-1492

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00912.x

Keywords

pulse wave velocity; arterial stiffness; renal transplantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. In subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis, aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) is increased independently of blood pressure level and mostly is a strong predictor of cardiovascular risk. Few studies on this subject have been performed in renal transplant patients. Methods. Aortic PWV was determined noninvasively in 106 patients with kidney transplantation and treated using a standard immunosuppression protocol. Mean age was 43+/-14 years. During the follow-up period (mean duration 54.3+/-28.9 months), the following parameters were studied: characteristics of the renal graft, degree of renal insufficiency, number of acute rejections, cardiovascular risk factors, drug medications, and cardiovascular complications. Results. Aortic PWV was increased in subjects with renal transplants independently of age and mean blood pressure. Acute renal rejection and smoking habits were the principal factors modulating together: the increase of aortic PWV and the reduction of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The latter renal parameter was also influenced by the donor age. Two main parameters were predictors of cardiovascular events: a past history of cardiovascular disease and the pulse pressure x heart rate product, the major mechanical consequence of increased PWV. Conclusion. In renal transplant subjects, tobacco consumption and mostly acute renal rejection modulate both aortic stiffness and chronic renal failure independent of blood pressure level and donor characteristics. Pulsatile stress mediates cardiovascular complications and predicts cardiovascular risk, particularly in the presence of increased heart rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available