4.6 Article

Evolutionary synthesis of galaxies at high spectral resolution with the code PEGASE-HR -: Metallicity and age tracers

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 425, Issue 3, Pages 881-897

Publisher

E D P SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200400044

Keywords

galaxies : stellar content; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : abundances; techniques : spectroscopic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present PEGASE-HR, a new stellar population synthesis program generating high resolution spectra (R=10000) over the optical range lambdalambda=400-680 nm. It links the spectro-photometric model of galaxy evolution PEGASE.2 (Fioc & Rocca-Volmerange 1997) to an updated version of the ELODIE library of stellar spectra observed with the 193 cm telescope at the Observatoire de Haute-Provence (Prugniel & Soubiran 2001 a). The ELODIE star set gives a fairly complete coverage of the Hertzprung-Russell (HR) diagram and makes it possible to synthesize populations in the range [Fe/H]=-2 to +0.4. This code is an exceptional tool for exploring signatures of metallicity, age, and kinematics. We focus on a detailed study of the sensitivity to age and metallicity of the high-resolution stellar absorption lines and of the classical metallic indices proposed until now to solve the age-metallicity degeneracy. Validity tests on several stellar lines are performed by comparing our predictions for Lick indices to the models of other groups. The comparison with the lower resolution library BaSeL (Lejeune et at. 1997) confirms the quality of the ELODIE library when used for single stellar populations (SSPs) from 10(7) to 2x10(10) yr. Predictions for the evolved populations of globular clusters and elliptical galaxies are given and compared to observational data. Two new high-resolution indices are proposed around the Hgamma line. They should prove useful in the analysis of spectra from the new generation of telescopes and spectrographs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available