3.8 Article

Catheter-mediated delivery of adenoviral vectors expressing β-adrenergic receptor kinase C-terminus inhibits intimal hyperplasia and luminal stenosis in rabbit iliac arteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages 1061-1068

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.592

Keywords

restenosis; intimal hyperplasia; gene transfer; beta ARK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Previous studies have shown that incubation of balloon-injured rat carotid arteries with adenoviral vectors encoding the carboxyl terminus of the beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (Ad2/betaARKct) for 30 min reduces neointima formation. However, it is unclear whether this beneficial effect of betaARKct could be achieved using a catheter-based vector delivery system and whether the observed inhibition of neointima formation translated into a reduction of vessel stenosis. Methods In this study, Ad2/betaARKct was infused into the balloon-injured site of rabbit iliac arteries using a porous infusion catheter over 2 min. Twenty-eight days after gene transfer, angiographic and histological assessments were performed. Results Angiographic and histological assessments indicate significant (p < 0.05) inhibition of iliac artery neointima formation and lumen stenosis by Ad2/betaARKct. Our studies demonstrate that an inhibitory effect of Ad2/betaARKct on neointima formation is achievable using a catheter-based vector delivery system and that the inhibition of neointima formation translates into a gain in the vessel minimal luminal diameter. The extent of inhibition (35%) was comparable to that observed with adenoviral-mediated expression of thymidine kinase plus ganciclovir treatment, a cytotoxic gene therapy approach for restenosis. Conclusions These results suggest that adenoviral-mediated gene transfer of betaARKct is a clinically viable cytostatic gene therapy strategy for the treatment of restenosis. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available