4.7 Article

Causes and consequences of high osmotic potentials in epiphytic higher plants

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 161, Issue 10, Pages 1119-1124

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.01.008

Keywords

drought stress; epiphytes; ferns; lycophytes; orchids; osmotic potential; photosynthesis; stomata; Taiwan; transpiration; water relations; water-storage parenchyma

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Past reports of the water relations of epiphytes, particularly bromeliads, indicate that tissue osmotic potentials in these tropical and subtropical. plants are very high (close to zero) and are similar to values for aquatic plants. This is puzzling because several ecophysiological studies have revealed a high degree of drought stress tolerance in some of these epiphytes. The goal of this study was two-fold: (1) to increase the number of epiphytic taxa sampled for tissue osmotic potentials; and (2) to explain the apparent discrepancy in the significance of the tissue water relations and tolerance of drought stress in epiphytes. Tissue osmotic potentials of 30 species of epiphytic ferns, lycophytes, and orchids were measured in a subtropical, rain forest in northeastern Taiwan. Nearly all values were Less negative than -1.0 MPa, in tine with all previous data for epiphytes. It is argued that such high osmotic potentials, indicative of tow solute concentrations, are the result of environmental constraints of the epiphytic habitat on productivity of these plants, and that low rates of photosynthesis and transpiration delay the onset of turgor toss in the tissues of epiphytes such that they appear to be very drought-stress tolerant. Maintenance of photosynthetic activity Long into drought periods is ascribed to low rates of transpiration and, hence, delayed tissue desiccation, and hydration of the photosynthetic tissue at the expense of water from the water-storage parenchyma. (C) 2004 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available