4.5 Article

123I-IMT SPECT and 1H MR-spectroscopy at 3.0 T in the differential diagnosis of recurrent or residual gliomas:: a comparative study

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 70, Issue 1, Pages 49-58

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/B:NEON.0000040810.77270.68

Keywords

3-[I-123]iodine-a-methyl-L-tyrosine; proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy; recurrent glioma; single photon emission tomography; 3.0 T

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this investigation was to compare two current non-invasive modalities, single photon emission tomography ( SPECT) using 123-iodine-alpha-methyl tyrosine (I-123-IMT) and single-voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-1-MRS) at 3.0 T, with regard to their ability to differentiate between residual/ recurrent tumors and treatment-related changes in patients pretreated for glioma. The patient population comprised 25 patients in whom recurrent glioma was suspected based on MR imaging. SPECT imaging started 10 min after iv. injection of 300-370 MBq I-123-IMT and was performed using a triple-head system. The IMT uptake was calculated semiquantitatively using regions-of-interest. H-1-MRS was performed at 3.0 T using the single-volume point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) technique. Guided by MR imaging volumes-of-interest for spectroscopy were placed into the suspected lesions. Signal intensities of choline-containing compounds (Cho), creatine and phosphocreatine (Cr), and N-acetylaspartate (NAA) were obtained. When using the cut-off of 1.62 for I-123-IMT uptake, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the I-123-IMT SPECT were 95, 100 and 96%, respectively. For H-1-MRS, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 89, 83 and 88%, respectively, based both on the metabolic ratios of Cho/Cr and Cho/NAA as tumor criterion with cut-off values of 1.11 and 1.17, respectively. In conclusion, I-123-IMT SPECT yielded more favorable results compared to H-1-MRS at distinguishing recurrent and/or residual glioma from posttherapeutic changes and may be particularly valuable when the evaluation of tumor extent is necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available