4.5 Article

Relations between insulin sensitivity, fitness and autonomic cardiac regulation in healthy, young men

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages 2007-2015

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200410000-00025

Keywords

autonomic nervous system; baroreflex control; glucose clamp technique; heart rate variability; insulin resistance; physical fitness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives We hypothesized that insulin sensitivity and vagal cardiac control are independently related in young men after adjustment for fitness and other confounding variables. Design Male volunteers aged 21-24 years with high (borderline hypertensive; n=20) and low-normal (normotensive; n=21) screening blood pressure (BP) were studied cross-sectionally. Methods Mean R-R interval (RR) and heart rate variability (HRV) were computed from 30-min ECGs, and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and latency (phase shift) from 15-min beat-to-beat finger blood pressure (BP) and heart rate recordings. Insulin-adjusted glucose disposal rate (GDR/I) was measured with a 90-min hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamp and fitness by peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) during a treadmill test. Results HRV, baroreflex function, GDR/I, and VO2peak did not differ between the groups. GDR/I correlated positively with time and frequency domain HRV, including high-frequency power (HF) (r=0.40, P=0.01) and root-mean squared successive differences (RMSSD) (r=0.43, P=0.005), but not BRS or phase shift. GDR/I correlated with VO2peak (r=0.70, P<0.0001) and was explained (R-2=0.56) by VO2peak (P=0.57, P<0.0001) and RR (beta=0.29, P=0.03), independently of H RV and measures of obesity. Conversely, RR (beta=0.55, P=0.0004) and H RV, including HF (beta=0.44, P=0.006) and RMSSD (beta=0.46, P=0.004) were explained by GDR/I, independently of VO2peak. Conclusions Insulin sensitivity and autonomic cardiac control are related independently of physical fitness in young men.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available