4.7 Article

A population-based study of diabetes and its characteristics during the fasting month of Ramadan 13 countries -: Results of the Epidemiology of Diabetes and Ramadan 1422/2001 (EPIDIAR) Study

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 2306-2311

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.10.2306

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics and care of patients with diabetes in countries with a sizable Muslim population and to study diabetes features during Ramadan and the effect of fasting, RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - This was a population-based, retrospective, transversal survey conducted in 13 countries. A total of 12,914 patients with diabetes were recruited using a stratified sampling method, and 12,243 were considered for the analysis. RESULTS - investigators recruited 1,070 (8.7%) patients with type 1 diabetes and 11,173, (91.3%) patients with type 2 diabetes. During Ramadan, 42.8% of patients with type 1 diabetes and 78.7% with type 2 diabetes fasted for at least 15 days. Less than 50% of the whole population changed their treatment dose (approximately one-fourth of patients treated with oral antidiabetic drugs [OADs] and one-third of patients using insulin). Severe hypoglycemic episodes were significantly more frequent during Ramadan compared with other months (type 1 diabetes, 0.14 vs. 0.03 episode/month, P = 0.0174; type 2 diabetes, 0.03 vs. 0.004 episode/month, P < 0.0001). Severe hypoglycemia was more frequent in subjects who changed their dose of OADs or insulin or modified their level of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS - The large proportion of both type 1 and type 2 diabetic subjects who fast during Ramadan represent a challenge to their physicians. There is a need to provide more intensive education before fasting, to disseminate guidelines, and to propose further Studies assessing the impact of fasting on morbidity and mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available