4.5 Article

Effect of work duration on physiological and rating scale of perceived exertion responses during self-paced interval training

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1600-0838.2003.00353.x

Keywords

endurance; athletes; intermittent exercise; heart rate; maximal oxygen consumption; perceived exertion

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared running velocity, physiological responses, and perceived exertion during self-paced interval training bouts differing only in work bout duration. Twelve well-trained runners (nine males, three females, 28+/-5 years, VO2 max 65+/-6 mL min(-1) kg(-1)) performed preliminary testing followed by four high-intensity interval sessions (Latin squares, 1 session week(-1) over 4 weeks) consisting of 24x1, 12x2, 6x4, or 4x6-min running bouts with a 1:1 work-to-rest interval (total session duration 48 min). The average running velocity decreased (93%, 88%, 86%, 84% vVO(2 max), P<0.01) with increasing work duration. Peak VO2 averaged about 92+/-4% of VO2 max for 2-, 4-, and 6-min intervals compared with only 82+/-5% for 1-min bouts (P<0.001). Six of 12 athletes achieved their highest average VO2 and heart rate during 4-min intervals. The average RPEpeak (rating scale of perceived exertion) was similar to17+/-1 for all four interval sessions. RPE increased by 2-4 U during an interval training session. The mean lactate concentration was similar across sessions (4.3+/-1.1-4.6+/-1.5 mmol L-1). Under self-paced conditions, well-trained runners perform high-intensity intervals at an RPE of similar to17, independent of interval duration. The optimal interval duration for eliciting a high physiological load is 3-5 min under these training conditions. Increases in RPE during an interval bout are not associated with increasing blood lactate concentration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available