4.1 Article

Hyper-expansion of asparagines correlates with an abundance of proteins with prion-like domains in Plasmodium falciparum

Journal

MOLECULAR AND BIOCHEMICAL PARASITOLOGY
Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages 307-319

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.05.016

Keywords

amino acid repeat; asparagine-rich; insertions; Plasmodium falciparum; prion-like domains

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plasmodium falciparum encodes similar to5300 proteins of which similar to35% have repeats of amino acids, significantly higher than in other fully sequenced eukaryotes. The proportion of proteins with amino acid homorepeats varies from 4 to 54% amongst different functional classes of proteins. These homorepeats are dominated by asparagines, which are selected over lysines despite equivalent AT codon content. Surprisingly, asparagine repeats are absent from the variant surface antigen protein families of PfEMP1s, Stevors and Rifins. The PfEMP1 protein family is instead rich in recurrences of glutamates, similar to human cell surface proteins. Structural mapping of homorepeats suggests that these segments are likely to form surface exposed structures that protrude from the main protein cores. We also found an abundance of asparagine-rich prion-like domains in P. falciparum, significantly larger than in any other eukaryote. Domains rich in glutamines and asparagines have an innate predisposition to form self-propagating amyloid fibers, which are involved both in prion-based inheritance and in human neurodegenerative disorders. Nearly 24% (1302 polypeptides) of P. falciparum proteins contain prion-forming or prion-inducing domains, in comparison to Drosophila (similar to3.4%) which to date showed the highest number of prion-like proteins. The unexpected properties of P. falciparum revealed here open new avenues for investigating parasite biology. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available