Journal
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages 550-570Publisher
UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/423751
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Recently, several philosophers have challenged the view that evolutionary theory is usefully understood by way of an analogy with Newtonian mechanics. Instead, they argue that evolutionary theory is merely a statistical theory. According to this alternate approach, natural selection and random genetic drift are not even causes, much less forces. I argue that, properly understood, the Newtonian analogy is unproblematic and illuminating. I defend the view that selection and drift are causes in part by attending to a pair of important distinctions-that between process and product and that between natural selection and fitness.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available