Journal
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
Volume 87, Issue 10, Pages 3480-3491Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73483-9
Keywords
dairy cow; forage source; nitrogen; environment
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study was designed to evaluate lactational responses of cows fed corn silage (CS) or alfalfa silage (AS) as primary forage source when the diet was balanced for recommended (RP) or excessive (HP) amounts of rumen degradable protein (RDP) and undegradable protein (RUP) according to the recommendations of the National Research Council (NRC). A second objective was to evaluate different sources of variations in milk urea N (MUN). The total mixed rations included 55% forage on a dry matter (DM) basis as either 14% CS and 41% AS or 14% AS and 41% CS. Diets were offered to 48 multiparous Holstein cows ( body weight = 652 kg) that were assigned randomly to treatments arranged as a 2 x 2 factorial in 12 complete blocks based on calving date. Data collected during wk 4 to 12 of lactation were adjusted to those obtained from a pretreatment diet fed during wk 1 to 3. Crude protein (CP) averaged 16.5, 18.0, 16.2, and 17.1% of DM in the AS-RP; AS-HP; CSRP; and CS-HP diets, respectively. Overall DM intake (DMI) was 1.5 kg/d lower than predicted by NRC (24.6 vs. 26.1 kg/d), but 3.5% fat-corrected milk (FCM) was higher than expected (46.1 vs. 45.0 kg/d). The responses to a reduction in dietary protein were independent of primary forage source, except for milk true protein (TP) percentage. Primary forage source did not influence DMI, 3.5% FCM, TP yield, or MUN. However, compared with the AS-based diets, cows fed CS-based diets produced more milk (49.0 vs. 46.4 kg/d), less fat (3.07% vs. 3.54% and 1500 vs. 1651 g/d), and tended to gain more body weight. There were no benefits to feeding diets above NRC protein recommendations, regardless of forage source. Reducing CP from 17.5 to 16.4% of diet DM did not alter milk yield ( 47.7 kg/d) or milk TP yield ( 1293 g/d), but lowered N intake by 65 g/d ( 700 vs. 635 g/d) and lowered MUN by 1 unit (12.7 vs. 11.7 mg/dL). A positive correlation between MUN and production efficiency ( 3.5% FCM/DMI) on wk 3 of lactation suggested that body protein mobilization might impact MUN in early lactation. The correlation between MUN and DMI tended to be negative in wk 3, but was positive in wk 6 to 12 of lactation. The same was true for the correlation between MUN and somatic cell score. Regression analysis of the postpeak lactation data of this study indicated that the expected MUN was essentially 12 mg/dL when NRC-predicted RDP and RUP balances were 0 g/d, with a linear deviation of 0.1 and 0.03 mg/ dL per 10 g of change in RDP and RUP balance, respectively.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available