4.6 Article

IL-1β regulates expression of Cx32, occludin, and claudin-2 of rat hepatocytes via distinct signal transduction pathways

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
Volume 299, Issue 2, Pages 427-441

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.06.011

Keywords

IL-1 beta; signal transduction; gap junctions; tight junctions; livers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The functions of gap and tight junctions are perturbed during the acute-phase response to liver injury. To elucidate the mechanism of proinflammatory cytokine IL-1beta responsible for regulation of hepatic gap and tight junctions, we analyzed expression and function of gap and tight junctions using a rat liver injury model and primary cultures of rat hepatocyte. In rat liver lobules at 24 h after thioacetamide (TAA) treatment, where some IL-1beta-positive non-parenchymal cells existed, disappearance of connexin32-positive spots at cell borders of the hepatocytes and increases of claudin-2 and occludin immunoreactivities in bile canalicular regions were observed. In primary cultures of rat hepatocytes, IL-1beta caused the disappearance of connexin32, which was reciprocal to the induction and localization of claudin-2 to cell membranes. The downregulated connexin32 expression was inhibited by treatment with a MAP-kinase inhibitor (PD98059), whereas the upregulated claudin-2 expression was blocked by p38 MAP and PI3-kinase inhibitors (SB203580 and LY294002). The changes of connexin32 and claudin-2 may be controlled at the transcriptional level via NF-kappaB, HNF-1alpha, and CDX2. Occludin was hyperphosphorylated by IL-1beta treatment and was inhibited by treatment with a PI3-kinase inhibitor. These results demonstrate that MAP-kinase, p38 MAP-kinase, and PI3-kinase are distinctly involved in the regulation of hepatic gap and tight junctions during the acute-phase response to IL-1beta. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available