4.5 Article

Scheduling for two-stage production system with setup and assembly operations

Journal

COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Volume 31, Issue 12, Pages 2063-2078

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00165-5

Keywords

scheduling; two-stage production system; machining operation; assembly operation; setup time; block size; pseudo-dynamic programming

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scheduling for two-stage production system including machining operations, setup operations and assembly operations is addressed, where a number of products of the same kind are produced. Each product is assembled with a set of several parts. The first stage is a single machine to produce parts. It can process all kinds of parts but can process only one part at the same time. Setup operation and setup time are needed when the machine starts processing or when the machine changes items (kinds) of parts. The second stage is a single assembly machine or a single assembly team of workers. The objective function is the mean completion time for all products. Machining operations, setup operations and assembly operations are partitioned into several blocks. Each block consists of the machining operations, the setup operations and the assembly operation(s) for one or several products. Parts of the same kind in a block are processed successively. We consider a problem to partition the operations into blocks and sequence the parts in each block so as to minimize the objective function. A solution procedure using pseudo-dynamic programming is proposed to obtain a near-optimal schedule. A tight lower bound is developed to evaluate the accuracy of the near-optimal schedule. Computational experiments are provided to evaluate the performance of the solution procedure. It has been found that a good near-optimal schedule is obtained efficiently by the proposed solution procedure. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available