4.7 Article

Geochronology of age-progressive volcanism of the Oregon High Lava Plains: Implications for the plume interpretation of Yellowstone

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
Volume 109, Issue B10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2003JB002776

Keywords

High Lava Plains; Yellowstone; argon; geochronology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The High Lava Plains province (HLP) is a late Cenozoic bimodal volcanic field at the northern margin of the Basin and Range province in southeastern Oregon that hosts a westward younging trend of silicic volcanism that crudely mirrors northeastward migration of silicic volcanism along the Yellowstone-Snake River Plain (YSRP) trend. We present 40Ar/39Ar ages for 19 rhyolite domes, 5 rhyolite ash flow tuffs, and 34 basaltic lavas from the HLP. The previously identified trend of westward migration of HLP rhyolites is confirmed. The rate of propagation is similar to33 km/m.y. from 10 to 5 Ma, slowing to similar to13 km/m.y. after 5 Ma. The duration of silicic volcanism at any locus is similar to2 m.y. Three older HLP dacite domes yielded ages of similar to15.5 Ma. Basalts are not age progressive. We identify several episodes of increased basaltic activity at 7.5-7.8, 5.3-5.9, and 2-3 Ma, with the younger episode likely continuing into the Recent. The HLP and YSRP trends emerged from the axis of middle Miocene basaltic volcanism of the Columbia River and Steens basalts. We propose a model in which (1) Miocene flood basalts and widespread silicic rocks are the result of emplacement of a plume head near the craton margin, enhanced by flow up a topographic gradient along the base of the lithosphere at the craton margin; (2) the HLP trend is the result of westward flow originating at the craton margin; and (3) the YSRP trend is the trace of the motion of the North American plate over the tail of the plume.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available