4.7 Article

Ultrasound energy improves myocardial perfusion in the presence of coronary occlusion

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 7, Pages 1454-1458

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.062

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES We evaluated whether ultrasound improves myocardial tissue perfusion in 14 animals with coronary artery occlusion. BACKGROUND A recent study demonstrated that low-frequency ultrasound improves tissue perfusion in the rabbit ischemic limb, but there are no data on ultrasound enhancement of myocardial perfusion. METHODS Fourteen animals (9 dogs, 5 pigs) underwent thoracotomy and occlusion of a diagonal branch of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Myocardial tissue perfusion units (TPUs) and pH were measured before coronary occlusion, after occlusion, and after direct exposure of the ischemic myocardium in the presence of fixed occlusion to low-frequency ultrasound (27 kHz). RESULTS The TPU decreased from 100.9 +/- 13 at baseline to 71.1 +/- 13 (p < 0.01) after 60 min occlusion but rose by 19.7% to 85.1 +/- 8 (p < 0.01) after ultrasound exposure for 60 min. After 60-min coronary occlusion, myocardial pH fell from 7.43 +/- 14 to 7.05 +/- 0.15 (p < 0.01) but then improved to normal (7.46 +/- 0.32) after ultrasound for 60 min. Administration of L-Nomega-nitro-arginine methyl esther (L-NAME), an inhibitor of nitric oxide, synthase, before ultrasound exposure, blocked improvement in myocardial tissue perfusion and pH by ultrasound. Quantitative histomorphology showed a significant increase in the capillary area of myocardium exposed to ultrasound versus non-exposed myocardium (16.2 +/- 7.9 vs. 8.2 +/- 2.1, p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Low-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound improves myocardial tissue perfusion and pH in the presence of a fixed coronary artery occlusion. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1454-8) (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available