4.8 Article

KATP channel activation induces ischemic preconditioning of the endothelium in humans in vivo

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 110, Issue 15, Pages 2077-2082

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000144304.91010.F0

Keywords

ischemia; reperfusion; potassium channels; ischemic preconditioning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-Endothelial dysfunction contributes to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and is reduced by ischemic preconditioning (IPC). IPC may involve activation of ATP-sensitive potassium channels (K(ATP)). We determined whether modulation of K(ATP) channels occurs in endothelial IPC in humans. Methods and Results-IRI of the forearm was induced by inflating a blood pressure cuff to 200 mm Hg for 20 minutes in healthy volunteers. K(ATP) activation was modulated by intra-arterial glibenclamide ( blocker) and diazoxide ( opener). Endothelial function ( response to intra-arterial acetylcholine) was assessed with forearm plethysmography before and after (1) 15-minute reperfusion, ( 2) IRI preceded by IPC ( 3 five-minute periods of ischemia), ( 3) IRI preceded by IPC with glibenclamide, ( 4) IPC followed by glibenclamide before IRI, ( 5) IRI preceded by diazoxide, and ( 6) IRI preceded by coinfusion of glibenclamide with diazoxide. IRI caused endothelial dysfunction (P = 0.002), which IPC prevented (P = 0.40). Glibenclamide abolished IPC when given contemporaneously with (P = 0.003) or during IRI (P = 0.0005). Diazoxide prevented endothelial dysfunction after IRI (P = 0.68) but not when coinfused with glibenclamide. Conclusion-Glibenclamide abolishes and diazoxide mimics endothelial IPC in humans. The time course of the effect of glibenclamide suggests involvement of K(ATP) channels as effectors of endothelial IPC in vivo. These data may have implications for understanding the therapeutic role of agents that modulate K(ATP) channel function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available