4.4 Article

Improved immunocytochemical identification of neural, endothelial, and inflammatory cell types in paraffin-embedded injured adult rat spinal cord

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 139, Issue 1, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.04.008

Keywords

autofluorescence; antigen retrieval; signal amplification; laminin; Hoechst staining

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 38665] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods that facilitate the accurate counting of specific neural cell types would be of substantial value in evaluating the efficacy of treatments applied to spinal cord injury. This report describes reliable procedures for identification of neurons, oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, endothelial cells and inflammatory cells (neutrophils and activated macrophage/microglial cells) in paraformaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded injured adult rat spinal cord. Antigen retrieval techniques (enzymatic and thermal) were used to improve antibody access to masked epitopes. To decrease background immunofluorescence and autofluorescence of hemoglobin, the tissue sections were pretreated with 0.1% sodium borohydride in PBS (30 min), followed by 1-5 min incubation in 0.5% Sudan black in 70% ethanol. Commercially available techniques to amplify the primary signal such as tyramide signal amplification (TSA) and avidin/biotin/peroxidase/DAB/nickel/cobalt amplification (ABP/DABA) were also tested. Hoechst 33342 nuclear staining was used to indicate cell location, number, and integrity, thereby avoiding misidentification of cells. The best antibodies were: anti-NeuN antibody for neurons, anti-S100 for astrocytes, and anti-S100 and APC-7 antibodies in combination for oligodendrocytes, anti-laminin (LN) for endothelial cells, and ED1 antibody for activated macrophages and microglia. Amplification of the primary signal with TSA or ABP/DABA was also found to be beneficial. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available