4.8 Article

Amperometric measurements of nitric oxide in erythrocytes

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 505-508

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2004.02.015

Keywords

nitric oxide; nitric oxide sensor; amperometric method; erythrocytes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the recent years, there has been an increase in the development of new biosensors that could be helpful in the study of various physiological processes. In this study, we report the development of a new in vitro experimental design for real-time nitric oxide (NO) amperometric measurements in erythrocyte suspensions. To achieve this, we employed human erythrocyte suspensions in sodium chloride 0.9%, pH 7 (haematocrit 0.05%). The production of NO by erythrocytes was measured with a commercial NO sensor during stimulation by L-arginine, acetylcholine. choline, atropine and velnacrine maleate (10 muM of final concentrations). We also measured the nitrite and nitrate concentrations produced by erythrocyte suspensions stimulated with the above effectors by means of the Griess reaction method. We observed that there was a direct relation between the electric current produced by the NO sensor, and the NO standard concentrations, thereby leading to a good calibration curve. The in vitro erythrocytes produced significant amperometric NO values in response to a wide range of effectors and these results have the same variation profile of the nitrites and nitrates results achieved with the Griess method. In conclusion, the amperometric NO sensor constitutes a reliable method for direct, and real-time measurement in vitro of the NO production of erythrocyte suspensions, As such, it offers a potential diagnostic technique for the evaluation of diseases, and the therapeutic progression of diseases, related to intracellular NO metabolism. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available